degree of confirmation approaches zero; striving for the highest-truth-likeliness will lead to undesirable results; we should not induct something based on X observed cases
Rationalist element in Popper's critical rationalism
when you find a conflicting example that is obtained, it does not lead to the immediate adjustment of the theory; the new observation must be first investigated in order to understand what happened for this conflicting example to come about
(Quine-Duhem) Conflict between theory and observation can be solved in two ways